Intelligence Analysis
Gulf States: Impact of the Iran-Israel Conflict on the Gulf Cooperation Council
24 JUN 2025
/
4 min read

KEY TAKEAWAYS
Fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel may gradually reopen Gulf airspace and economies.
Scale of regional disruptions, from widespread airspace closures to mass evacuations, galvanized diplomatic efforts.
Lasting stability relies on renewed US-Iran diplomatic engagement and proxy restraint.
The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), comprising Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, is unlikely to experience sustained disruptions beyond residual flight delays and heightened security measures following Tehran's retaliatory strikes against the Al-Udeid base and amid reports of a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel.
As of early June 24, Qatar has brokered a ceasefire agreement between Tehran and Tel Aviv. If the ceasefire holds in the next few days, airspace closures will likely be lifted and commercial operations across the GCC will probably normalize gradually. However, should the ceasefire collapse, the region could face widespread transport, aviation, and economic disruptions.
Regional Escalation Disrupts Gulf Airspace
The conflict, which erupted June 13, triggered significant operational instability across the Middle East. On June 23, in anticipation of Iranian retaliation following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, several GCC countries, including Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE, temporarily closed their airspace. This was one of the clearest demonstrations of how regional escalation can directly affect Gulf states, emphasizing their strategic exposure to broader geopolitical tensions.
Ceasefire Tenuous Amid Reports of Potential Violations
Iran's retaliatory missile strikes targeted Al-Udeid Airbase in Qatar, home to the largest US military presence in the region. The attack, however, was widely viewed as symbolic and deliberately limited in scope to avoid casualties. US President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged Iran's restrained response and later claimed that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire. However, reports indicate that at least one ballistic missile was launched from Iran at Israel after the ceasefire was reportedly in effect. The missile was intercepted, leading to no damage or casualties. The coming days will be critical to ensure the ceasefire remains in effect and further violations are possible.
The coming days will be critical to ensure the ceasefire remains in effect and further violations are possible. Even if the ceasefire holds, it will unlikely result in long-term peace. Iran and Israel will probably resume their decades-long shadow conflict, marked by cyberattacks, sabotage, proxy warfare, and targeted assassinations.
Key Factors in De-Escalation
The apparent willingness to de-escalate stems largely from the unsustainable military and economic toll on both sides. Iran has sustained major damage to military bases, nuclear facilities, and energy infrastructure. In turn, Israel has absorbed strikes on critical infrastructure. Both sides also face material constraints, and these pressures may be contributing to the current pause in hostilities.
The scale of regional disruptions, from widespread airspace closures to mass evacuations, galvanized diplomatic efforts led by European states, GCC countries, and others to secure a ceasefire.
Regional Instability Likely to Persist Long-Term
As direct confrontation subsides, attention is shifting to Iran's regional proxies. The Al-Houthis in Yemen, despite a ceasefire agreement with the US, have renewed threats against American vessels in the Red Sea. Iraqi Shi'a militias have also resumed attacks on US bases in Iraq since the conflict began.
While the GCC states have thus far weathered the conflict with limited direct fallout, they remain strategically vulnerable to regional instability. The Gulf states are, therefore, likely to prepare for a protracted period of latent risk marked by proxy attacks, cyber threats, and recurring disruptions to airspace and commerce. Long-term stability will depend not only on restraint from Israel and Iran but also on renewed diplomatic engagement, especially between the US and Iran, to address the deeper geopolitical fault lines.
If your organization has people or assets in the Middle East, our experts can help to stay ahead of the situation and protect your employees and operations.
Related
Sharpen your
view of risk
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our analysts’ latest insights in your inbox every week.
Intelligence & Insights
Intelligence
Worth Gathering
Employing a team of 200+ analysts around the world, Crisis24 is the only source you need for on-point, actionable insights on any risk-related topic.

Intelligence Analysis
Synthetic Reality Attacks Pose Rising Operational Risks to International Firms and Travelers
Synthetic reality attacks are emerging as a challenging risk to global corporate operations and international travel.
July 7, 2025

Intelligence Analysis
Impact of Cuts to Forecasting Services Uncertain During Above-Average US Hurricane Season
The 2025 Atlantic Hurricane season is forecast to see above-average levels of storm activity and recent cuts to services may impact the ability of forecasters.
By Charles Hogger
June 30, 2025

Intelligence Analysis
Critical Alert: Iran-Israel Armed Conflict
Crisis24 Alert | Middle East: Ceasefire continues to hold in Iran-Israel Conflict
June 25, 2025

Intelligence Analysis
Evolving North Korean Ghost Worker Threat Underscores Global Dynamic Risk Environment
North Korean “ghost workers” use fake identities and documents to secure remote IT jobs, posing legal, financial, and reputational risks to organizations.
By Jonathan Vincent
June 25, 2025