Explore Elite Risk Management Services

Private Strategic Group
SolutionsCapabilitiesPlatformsInsightsIntelligenceAbout

Search

Intelligence Analysis

Gulf States: Impact of the Iran-Israel Conflict on the Gulf Cooperation Council

24 JUN 2025

/

4 min read


Gulf States: Impact of the Iran-Israel Conflict on the Gulf Cooperation Council

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel may gradually reopen Gulf airspace and economies.

  • Scale of regional disruptions, from widespread airspace closures to mass evacuations, galvanized diplomatic efforts.

  • Lasting stability relies on renewed US-Iran diplomatic engagement and proxy restraint. 

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), comprising Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, is unlikely to experience sustained disruptions beyond residual flight delays and heightened security measures following Tehran's retaliatory strikes against the Al-Udeid base and amid reports of a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel. 

As of early June 24, Qatar has brokered a ceasefire agreement between Tehran and Tel Aviv. If the ceasefire holds in the next few days, airspace closures will likely be lifted and commercial operations across the GCC will probably normalize gradually. However, should the ceasefire collapse, the region could face widespread transport, aviation, and economic disruptions. 

Regional Escalation Disrupts Gulf Airspace

The conflict, which erupted June 13, triggered significant operational instability across the Middle East. On June 23, in anticipation of Iranian retaliation following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, several GCC countries, including Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE, temporarily closed their airspace. This was one of the clearest demonstrations of how regional escalation can directly affect Gulf states, emphasizing their strategic exposure to broader geopolitical tensions. 

Ceasefire Tenuous Amid Reports of Potential Violations

Iran's retaliatory missile strikes targeted Al-Udeid Airbase in Qatar, home to the largest US military presence in the region. The attack, however, was widely viewed as symbolic and deliberately limited in scope to avoid casualties. US President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged Iran's restrained response and later claimed that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire. However, reports indicate that at least one ballistic missile was launched from Iran at Israel after the ceasefire was reportedly in effect. The missile was intercepted, leading to no damage or casualties. The coming days will be critical to ensure the ceasefire remains in effect and further violations are possible. 

The coming days will be critical to ensure the ceasefire remains in effect and further violations are possible. Even if the ceasefire holds, it will unlikely result in long-term peace. Iran and Israel will probably resume their decades-long shadow conflict, marked by cyberattacks, sabotage, proxy warfare, and targeted assassinations.  

Key Factors in De-Escalation

The apparent willingness to de-escalate stems largely from the unsustainable military and economic toll on both sides. Iran has sustained major damage to military bases, nuclear facilities, and energy infrastructure. In turn, Israel has absorbed strikes on critical infrastructure. Both sides also face material constraints, and these pressures may be contributing to the current pause in hostilities. 

The scale of regional disruptions, from widespread airspace closures to mass evacuations, galvanized diplomatic efforts led by European states, GCC countries, and others to secure a ceasefire.  

Regional Instability Likely to Persist Long-Term

As direct confrontation subsides, attention is shifting to Iran's regional proxies. The Al-Houthis in Yemen, despite a ceasefire agreement with the US, have renewed threats against American vessels in the Red Sea. Iraqi Shi'a militias have also resumed attacks on US bases in Iraq since the conflict began. 

While the GCC states have thus far weathered the conflict with limited direct fallout, they remain strategically vulnerable to regional instability. The Gulf states are, therefore, likely to prepare for a protracted period of latent risk marked by proxy attacks, cyber threats, and recurring disruptions to airspace and commerce. Long-term stability will depend not only on restraint from Israel and Iran but also on renewed diplomatic engagement, especially between the US and Iran, to address the deeper geopolitical fault lines. 

If your organization has people or assets in the Middle East, our experts can help to stay ahead of the situation and protect your employees and operations.   

Sharpen your 
view of risk

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our analysts’ latest insights in your inbox every week.