European Jet Fuel Disruptions Raise Summer Travel Risks

New EU guidance on jet fuel is a clear signal that Brussels is preparing for continued disruptions to Middle East energy flows. This includes localized jet fuel scarcity, flight cancellations, longer travel times, and higher fares. The guidance issued on May 8 suggests that regulators are preparing for localized shortages, uneven airport supply, and a summer season in which operational flexibility will matter as much as headline fuel availability.  

EU jet fuel rules normally discourage airlines from carrying excessive fuel from one airport to another because the added weight increases emissions and can distort competition by allowing carriers to refuel disproportionately at cheaper airports. However, the new guidance clarifies that this restriction can now be relaxed when operational safety or fuel availability requires additional uplift, indicating that regulators are preparing for situations in which carrying extra fuel may be necessary to maintain service continuity. This decision allows airlines to manage shortages before they become visible to passengers.

Also under the new guidance, if one airport has reliable fuel and another does not, an airline may be able to depart with additional fuel to reduce dependence on the destination airport. This practice, known as “tankering,” can protect operations but also increases fuel use. The guidance notes that airlines cannot levy fuel surcharges retroactively on tickets that have already been sold, and elevated fuel prices do not, in themselves, constitute “extraordinary circumstances” for the purposes of compensation. By contrast, a localized shortage of jet fuel at a particular airport may meet that threshold. 

Additional imports are easing immediate pressure on Europe’s jet-fuel market, but supply conditions remain fragile ahead of peak summer demand. European jet-fuel prices have eased slightly since 1 May, supported by additional imports from the US and Nigeria. This has helped to relieve the market for immediate supply. However, the improvement remains fragile as prices are still more than twice their pre-war level, and inventories continue to be drawn down.

Jet fuel is a specialized refined product. It cannot be replaced quickly by crude oil or by other fuels without compatible refining, certification, storage, and airport delivery systems. This makes the supply chain less flexible than it may appear. A cargo arriving from the US can relieve short-term pressure, but it does not automatically restore the deeper buffer that airports and airlines need for a resilient summer schedule. Nigerian and American supplies should be interpreted as a partial stabilizer rather than a full solution. Refinery performance, export logistics, competing demand, and fuel quality requirements will all shape how much product can reach European airports in time.

• 30 Day Outlook: conditions are likely to remain tight but broadly manageable, provided Atlantic Basin replacement flows continue and Asian exports normalize further to stabilize the market.  
• 60 Day Outlook: the risk rises to moderate, as Europe enters the peak travel season and supply stress is increasingly shaped by logistics, storage accessibility, and airport-level distribution constraints. Tankering will help relieve diminishing fuel supplies.  
• 90 Day Outlook and Beyond: The outlook beyond the next two months is uncertain and highly dependent on the development of the Hormuz crisis. Localized shortages, schedule reductions, and selective disruptions may occur at the most import-dependent airports. 

Airlines are likely to manage the fuel shock through selective network adjustments and efficient aircraft utilization rather than broad suspension of service. Large carriers will protect major hubs, long-haul routes, and profitable leisure markets first. Smaller carriers, if not hedged, may face sharper margin pressure and have fewer options to absorb higher fuel costs, making them more likely to reduce frequencies, suspend weaker routes, raise fares, seek emergency financing, or, in the most exposed cases, enter insolvency or cease operations.

As the summer travel season unfolds, fuel stops may become more common on selected routes if airlines cannot rely on destination supply or if carrying extra fuel becomes operationally preferable. These stops increase journey time and can create knock-on risks for crew schedules, aircraft utilization, and passenger connections. Tankering can reduce dependence on constrained airports, but it also raises operating costs and may reduce payload flexibility and, therefore, air cargo revenue.

The operational impact is likely to remain highly uneven across the European aviation network. Large airports with strong storage, pipeline access, and airline priority should remain more resilient. Smaller airports, isolated markets, and airports dependent on more complex supply chains may face greater vulnerability.

Europe’s aviation system is likely to remain operational through the summer peak, but with reduced flexibility and greater exposure to localized disruptions. The most significant risks will likely stem from uneven fuel availability, selective schedule adjustments, and longer recovery times when disruptions occur. The following indicators and travel considerations will be important to monitor through the summer season.

• Passengers who have already purchased air tickets will not be subject to retroactive fuel surcharges.
• Travelers should prioritize direct flights, major hubs, larger airlines, and higher-frequency routes. Critical travel should include backup routing and more generous connection windows.
• The most vulnerable itineraries are those involving secondary airports, low-frequency routes, and airlines already adjusting capacity.
• Compensation rights for canceled flights remain in place unless the carrier can establish that the cancellation was due to extraordinary circumstances beyond its control, such as a localized fuel shortage, and that all reasonable mitigating measures were taken; high fuel prices alone do not qualify.
• Any reliance on contractual war-related clauses will be limited and fact-specific rather than automatic under EU passenger-rights law. 

Learn more about leveraging intelligence to stay ahead of risks to your people and operations.